google analytics
Sunday, July 5, 2015
Eleni Karaindrou - An Ode Of Tears!
Sing, oh Muse,
Sing, oh Muse, a new melody
A tune for the dead, an ode of tears
On Troy's tomb,
For Troy I shall now wail a melancholy melody
For Troy I shall now wail a melancholy melody
I'll recount how I was lost
And how I was enslaved, miserable me,
By the Argeians four-wheeled carriage.
How the Achaeans left the Horse
Neighing to the sky
With the golden ornaments
Outside our portals
Sing, oh Muse, a new melody,
A tune for the dead, an ode of tears
On Troy's tomb.
why jump
why jump shadows
when you can just
step across
to meet?
when you are afraid
i will build bridges
drawn with flowers
and the smile of donkeys
but if you walk away
i will search oblivion
in the forest of life
and swim in my waters
the lakes are deep
and silvery from the moon
the birds pause in their song
when i reach the shore
there i will rise
with the wind
like smoke, gone
far into the sky
where i will be nameless
and cannot be called
to drift with fate
until.
On Pain, Khalil Gibran
Your pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses
your understanding.
Even as the stone of the fruit must break, that its
heart may stand in the sun, so must you know pain.
And could you keep your heart in wonder at the
daily miracles of your life, your pain would not seem
less wondrous than your joy;
And you would accept the seasons of your heart,
even as you have always accepted the seasons that
pass over your fields.
And you would watch with serenity through the
winters of your grief.
Much of your pain is self-chosen.
It is the bitter potion by which the physician within
you heals your sick self.
Therefore trust the physician, and drink his remedy
in silence and tranquillity:
For his hand, though heavy and hard, is guided by
the tender hand of the Unseen,
And the cup he brings, though it burn your lips, has
been fashioned of the clay which the Potter has
moistened with His own sacred tears.
your understanding.
Even as the stone of the fruit must break, that its
heart may stand in the sun, so must you know pain.
And could you keep your heart in wonder at the
daily miracles of your life, your pain would not seem
less wondrous than your joy;
And you would accept the seasons of your heart,
even as you have always accepted the seasons that
pass over your fields.
And you would watch with serenity through the
winters of your grief.
Much of your pain is self-chosen.
It is the bitter potion by which the physician within
you heals your sick self.
Therefore trust the physician, and drink his remedy
in silence and tranquillity:
For his hand, though heavy and hard, is guided by
the tender hand of the Unseen,
And the cup he brings, though it burn your lips, has
been fashioned of the clay which the Potter has
moistened with His own sacred tears.
Khalil Gibran
Auguries of Innocence, William Blake, extract
To see a World in a Grain of Sand
And a Heaven in a Wild Flower,
Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand
And Eternity in an hour.
And a Heaven in a Wild Flower,
Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand
And Eternity in an hour.
Labels:
Auguries of Innocence,
extract,
William Blake
An almost made up poem, Charles Bukowski
I see you drinking at a fountain with tiny
blue hands, no, your hands are not tiny
they are small, and the fountain is in France
where you wrote me that last letter and
I answered and never heard from you again.
you used to write insane poems about
ANGELS AND GOD, all in upper case, and you
knew famous artists and most of them
were your lovers, and I wrote back, it’ all right,
go ahead, enter their lives, I’ not jealous
because we’ never met. we got close once in
New Orleans, one half block, but never met, never
touched. so you went with the famous and wrote
about the famous, and, of course, what you found out
is that the famous are worried about
their fame –– not the beautiful young girl in bed
with them, who gives them that, and then awakens
in the morning to write upper case poems about
ANGELS AND GOD. we know God is dead, they’ told
us, but listening to you I wasn’ sure. maybe
it was the upper case. you were one of the
best female poets and I told the publishers,
editors, “ her, print her, she’ mad but she’
magic. there’ no lie in her fire.” I loved you
like a man loves a woman he never touches, only
writes to, keeps little photographs of. I would have
loved you more if I had sat in a small room rolling a
cigarette and listened to you piss in the bathroom,
but that didn’ happen. your letters got sadder.
your lovers betrayed you. kid, I wrote back, all
lovers betray. it didn’ help. you said
you had a crying bench and it was by a bridge and
the bridge was over a river and you sat on the crying
bench every night and wept for the lovers who had
hurt and forgotten you. I wrote back but never
heard again. a friend wrote me of your suicide
3 or 4 months after it happened. if I had met you
I would probably have been unfair to you or you
to me. it was best like this.
blue hands, no, your hands are not tiny
they are small, and the fountain is in France
where you wrote me that last letter and
I answered and never heard from you again.
you used to write insane poems about
ANGELS AND GOD, all in upper case, and you
knew famous artists and most of them
were your lovers, and I wrote back, it’ all right,
go ahead, enter their lives, I’ not jealous
because we’ never met. we got close once in
New Orleans, one half block, but never met, never
touched. so you went with the famous and wrote
about the famous, and, of course, what you found out
is that the famous are worried about
their fame –– not the beautiful young girl in bed
with them, who gives them that, and then awakens
in the morning to write upper case poems about
ANGELS AND GOD. we know God is dead, they’ told
us, but listening to you I wasn’ sure. maybe
it was the upper case. you were one of the
best female poets and I told the publishers,
editors, “ her, print her, she’ mad but she’
magic. there’ no lie in her fire.” I loved you
like a man loves a woman he never touches, only
writes to, keeps little photographs of. I would have
loved you more if I had sat in a small room rolling a
cigarette and listened to you piss in the bathroom,
but that didn’ happen. your letters got sadder.
your lovers betrayed you. kid, I wrote back, all
lovers betray. it didn’ help. you said
you had a crying bench and it was by a bridge and
the bridge was over a river and you sat on the crying
bench every night and wept for the lovers who had
hurt and forgotten you. I wrote back but never
heard again. a friend wrote me of your suicide
3 or 4 months after it happened. if I had met you
I would probably have been unfair to you or you
to me. it was best like this.
Labels:
An almost made up poem,
Charles Bukowski
Fire and Ice, Robert Frost
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
Simplicity, Jorges Luis Borges
Simplicity
It opens, the gate to the garden
with the docility of a page
that frequent devotion questions
and inside, my gaze
has no need to fix on objects
that already exist, exact, in memory.
I know the customs and souls
and that dialect of allusions
that every human gathering goes weaving.
I've no need to speak
nor claim false privilege;
they know me well who surround me here,
know well my afflictions and weakness.
This is to reach the highest thing,
that Heaven perhaps will grant us:
not admiration or victory
but simply to be accepted
as part of an undeniable Reality,
like stones and trees.
Jorges Luis Borges
It opens, the gate to the garden
with the docility of a page
that frequent devotion questions
and inside, my gaze
has no need to fix on objects
that already exist, exact, in memory.
I know the customs and souls
and that dialect of allusions
that every human gathering goes weaving.
I've no need to speak
nor claim false privilege;
they know me well who surround me here,
know well my afflictions and weakness.
This is to reach the highest thing,
that Heaven perhaps will grant us:
not admiration or victory
but simply to be accepted
as part of an undeniable Reality,
like stones and trees.
Jorges Luis Borges
Pour faire le portrait d'un oiseau
stolen~beautiful.
next poem:
how to paint the cage so it can be opened from inside....
To Paint a Bird's Portrait
Paint first a cage
with the door open
next paint
something pretty
something simple
something lovely
something of use
to the bird
then put the canvas near a tree
in a garden
in the woods
or in a forest
hide behind the tree
say nothing
don’t move…
Sometimes the bird comes quickly
but it can just as well take many years
before deciding
Don’t be disheartened
wait
wait years if need be
the pace of the bird’s arrival
bearing no relation
to the success of the painting
When the bird comes
if it comes
keep very still
wait for the bird to enter the cage
and once it has
gently shut the door with the brush
then
paint out the bars one by one
taking care not to touch any of the bird’s feathers
Next paint the tree’s portrait
choosing the loveliest of its branches
for the bird
paint likewise the green leaves and fresh breeze
the sun’s scintillation
and the clamor of crickets in the heat of summer
and then wait until the bird decides to sing
If the bird does not sing
that’s a bad sign
A sign the painting is no good
but if it sings that’s a good sign
a sign you can sign
next poem:
how to paint the cage so it can be opened from inside....
To Paint a Bird's Portrait
Paint first a cage
with the door open
next paint
something pretty
something simple
something lovely
something of use
to the bird
then put the canvas near a tree
in a garden
in the woods
or in a forest
hide behind the tree
say nothing
don’t move…
Sometimes the bird comes quickly
but it can just as well take many years
before deciding
Don’t be disheartened
wait
wait years if need be
the pace of the bird’s arrival
bearing no relation
to the success of the painting
When the bird comes
if it comes
keep very still
wait for the bird to enter the cage
and once it has
gently shut the door with the brush
then
paint out the bars one by one
taking care not to touch any of the bird’s feathers
Next paint the tree’s portrait
choosing the loveliest of its branches
for the bird
paint likewise the green leaves and fresh breeze
the sun’s scintillation
and the clamor of crickets in the heat of summer
and then wait until the bird decides to sing
If the bird does not sing
that’s a bad sign
A sign the painting is no good
but if it sings that’s a good sign
a sign you can sign
Hierarchy
i grew up with my father forwarding to me and discussing with me the paths of spiritual enlightenment and of eastern wisdom and the path of compassion, the grace of the avatars, those free of re-incarnation who decided to step down again and help us in our need and suffering.
in his younger years my father had found inspiration in theosophy (H.Blavatsky) and he kept busy studying Paracelsus all his life, the Kabbalah and the Bhagavad Gita.
i grasped as a child that all religions have just one source as all words have, of which the latter was not hard to believe with continous exploration of etymology.
my young curiosity made me ask questions without end.
at school i met the teachings of christianity in various aspects, crude and ridden with guilt and sacrifice and blood and a history of martyrdom and heroism. I couldn't see any path to follow in it, and i could not find to "believe" as requested.
in my later years, what put me off in my mid-twenties, was not so much studying medicine and coming to modern scientific thinking: it was the mistrust in a hierarchical order of the universe.
in theosophy though admitting multiple universes which i find attractive to this day, a human is shown to consist of lower and higher levels from the mere physical to the highest spiritual level.
only: up to this day i cannot see the division between matter and spirit, i see matter is spirit. it is a perception, a working in the mind.
i feel the human should not bee seen in this way, in the division of parts less worth and more worth
nor in a light centered only on the human itself. i rather put the question: is the rose bush worth less than the rose as a flower? and is not the rose the same as we are, the universe and the earth unfolding?
hierarchy thinking is quickly arrogant and creates a division between "them" and "us".
when hierachically structured systems are used, this is easily taken as a tool for domination.
To be clear, it is as if to say: this is more beautiful than this. such a statement must be untrue. either something or somebody whatever these words can mean is seen as beautiful or as not beautiful.
the quality of beauty is lost in comparison.
it is the same with ugliness. i could say, it is ugly as an experience to see somebody
cruelly torturing an animal. when i should start to compare it to other ugly experiences,
the quality of ugliness may be lost in its full meaning.
unfortunately our perception of the experiene of qualities gets blunted by repetition and comparison.
as an example, this is brought on to happen with the daily news. one war and one suffering after the other appear on our tv screens for commercial entertainment. it is too easy to say, this is bad. and o, this is really bad. this is worse. in the end, thanks god i am not there.
this is exactly what happens: this stream of ugliness takes our presence away and in the end may even bore us and leave us in total estrangement from us and reality.
the quality of ugliness is lost, and boredom is the result.
now comes the difficult part, and it confuses me.it will continue to confuse me.
it is the badness in the world as i wouldn't know another name or term.
it confuses me, even my own..
it is very clearly there.
and there are people whom i experience as more bad than others.
it see it as important in each case NOT to compare them to other bad people.
it would again make badness a matter of "relatively" bad or "absolute" bad or not "so" bad.
i cannot accept this. bad is bad.
the difficult part now is: are people who concentrate a lot of badness in them less developed
spiritually than others? i don't know because there are many people who are not in any visible way developing much at all, they are just living restrained in their badness by law, opinion and habit, their narrow perspective doesn't allow their badness to come outside the full way. under other circumstances i could easily imagine them as wardens in a concentration camp.
so, without fixing this to hierarchical systems, i think there are persons spiritually more developed than others and it is not just a matter of intellect and intelligence acquired from books but a result of the heart of life itself flowering and smiling.
and it appears to me that it is more easy for some to allow this to be than for others, from birth.
for the "many" it can be true that they remember this in their depth and they have to fight through rubbish and obstacles, through clouds and memories and tears to create space for their heart and spirit to flow.
the old teachings in zen, in meditation, as long as they don't give a system, they can be some of the tools to create space by dissolving the inner noise and clouds.
the only wisdom i can see is kindness.
not a temporary personal enlightenment nor to reach a far and egoistic goal of non-reincarnation.
just light.
http://www.transpersonalstudies.org/ImagesRepository/ijts/Downloads/Friedman%20et%20al%20Spiritual%20Development.pdf
in his younger years my father had found inspiration in theosophy (H.Blavatsky) and he kept busy studying Paracelsus all his life, the Kabbalah and the Bhagavad Gita.
i grasped as a child that all religions have just one source as all words have, of which the latter was not hard to believe with continous exploration of etymology.
my young curiosity made me ask questions without end.
at school i met the teachings of christianity in various aspects, crude and ridden with guilt and sacrifice and blood and a history of martyrdom and heroism. I couldn't see any path to follow in it, and i could not find to "believe" as requested.
in my later years, what put me off in my mid-twenties, was not so much studying medicine and coming to modern scientific thinking: it was the mistrust in a hierarchical order of the universe.
in theosophy though admitting multiple universes which i find attractive to this day, a human is shown to consist of lower and higher levels from the mere physical to the highest spiritual level.
only: up to this day i cannot see the division between matter and spirit, i see matter is spirit. it is a perception, a working in the mind.
i feel the human should not bee seen in this way, in the division of parts less worth and more worth
nor in a light centered only on the human itself. i rather put the question: is the rose bush worth less than the rose as a flower? and is not the rose the same as we are, the universe and the earth unfolding?
hierarchy thinking is quickly arrogant and creates a division between "them" and "us".
when hierachically structured systems are used, this is easily taken as a tool for domination.
To be clear, it is as if to say: this is more beautiful than this. such a statement must be untrue. either something or somebody whatever these words can mean is seen as beautiful or as not beautiful.
the quality of beauty is lost in comparison.
it is the same with ugliness. i could say, it is ugly as an experience to see somebody
cruelly torturing an animal. when i should start to compare it to other ugly experiences,
the quality of ugliness may be lost in its full meaning.
unfortunately our perception of the experiene of qualities gets blunted by repetition and comparison.
as an example, this is brought on to happen with the daily news. one war and one suffering after the other appear on our tv screens for commercial entertainment. it is too easy to say, this is bad. and o, this is really bad. this is worse. in the end, thanks god i am not there.
this is exactly what happens: this stream of ugliness takes our presence away and in the end may even bore us and leave us in total estrangement from us and reality.
the quality of ugliness is lost, and boredom is the result.
now comes the difficult part, and it confuses me.it will continue to confuse me.
it is the badness in the world as i wouldn't know another name or term.
it confuses me, even my own..
it is very clearly there.
and there are people whom i experience as more bad than others.
it see it as important in each case NOT to compare them to other bad people.
it would again make badness a matter of "relatively" bad or "absolute" bad or not "so" bad.
i cannot accept this. bad is bad.
the difficult part now is: are people who concentrate a lot of badness in them less developed
spiritually than others? i don't know because there are many people who are not in any visible way developing much at all, they are just living restrained in their badness by law, opinion and habit, their narrow perspective doesn't allow their badness to come outside the full way. under other circumstances i could easily imagine them as wardens in a concentration camp.
so, without fixing this to hierarchical systems, i think there are persons spiritually more developed than others and it is not just a matter of intellect and intelligence acquired from books but a result of the heart of life itself flowering and smiling.
and it appears to me that it is more easy for some to allow this to be than for others, from birth.
for the "many" it can be true that they remember this in their depth and they have to fight through rubbish and obstacles, through clouds and memories and tears to create space for their heart and spirit to flow.
the old teachings in zen, in meditation, as long as they don't give a system, they can be some of the tools to create space by dissolving the inner noise and clouds.
the only wisdom i can see is kindness.
not a temporary personal enlightenment nor to reach a far and egoistic goal of non-reincarnation.
just light.
http://www.transpersonalstudies.org/ImagesRepository/ijts/Downloads/Friedman%20et%20al%20Spiritual%20Development.pdf
Lewis Carroll, What theTortoise said to Achilles
The following links leads to
"Goedel,Escher, bach" by Douglas R. Hofstadter
Mind you, there are a lot of mistakes in it, wrong spelling etc.
http://www.physixfan.com/wp-content/files/GEBen.pdf
life
silence
sometimes, and i am sure of this, it is not a good moment to write poems,
to write, to talk...
to write, to talk...
Michael Brook & Djivan Gasparyan - Take My Heart
"I wish you were a flower in my garden. I wish you were a bird flying over my garden. I wish you were with me, my love. Stay with me, don't cause me too much pain. You may take my heart away if you wish, only please don't leave me. Stay with me and I will do anything for you."
Labels:
Djivan Gasparyan,
Michael Brook,
Take My Heart
Hossein Alizadeh & Djivan Gasparyan - Birds, M.Azad
if anybody has the english lyrics from Mahoud Moshref Azad Tehrani's text:
please comment!
Labels:
Birds,
Djivan Gasparyan,
Hossein Alizadeh
Yasmin Levy - Algo De Ti
Yasmin Levy - Algo De Ti
Algo de mi olvidarás cuando te vayas de aquí, algo de mi recordarás cuando te alejes de mi, y algo siempre quedara contigo después que atranques esta puerta y te vayas para no volver jamás. Algo de ti se quedará aunque yo me quede aquí, algo de ti permanecerá cuando me separe de ti, y algo siempre seguirá viviendo y dejará la puerta abierta, quizás llegará el día que vuelvas… Algo de ti se quedará aunque yo me quede aquí, algo de ti permanecerá cuando me separe de ti, y algo siempre seguirá viviendo y dejará la puerta abierta quizás llegará el día que vuelvas… Después que te fuiste el infierno llegó, parece que las calles están cubiertas de tristeza, estoy vagando por los callejones alejados como una sombra de la mujer que fui, pero encontraré mis propias fuerzas y de nuevo sonreiré porque la vida es tan bella que hay que vivirla plenamente, Y la felicidad sólo de mí depende
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)